GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

For the details you don’t want to compromise.

Meet Sunburst, OpenAI’s most capable image generation and editing model. Give it a detailed brief or upload an image with a specific change in mind. Try it here, free.

Up to 3 free images every 30 days, shared across image tools. No sign-up. 1024 × 1024 PNG at medium quality.

How GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst works

1. Start with a T-shirt idea

Describe the shirt, the artwork, and the words you want on it. Here, a cream tee gets a coral sun and green “WEEKEND CLUB” lettering. Ask for a clean product photo to see the idea as a piece of merch, or upload your own design as a reference.
Start with a T-shirt idea

2. Refine the details with Sunburst

Try Sunburst when the brief has details to keep consistent: exact lettering, a centered graphic, and a believable print on fabric. Review the words, colors, and placement before using the image to present your product idea.
Refine the details with Sunburst

3. Try another colorway

Save the PNG or continue in Playground’s editor. Ask: “Make the shirt butter yellow. Keep the print the same.” Compare the versions for your collection or shop concept, and check that the lettering and graphic stayed intact. Editor access and usage follow your account’s plan.
Try another colorway

Try your first T-shirt design

Have an idea for a small merch drop? Start with the shirt, the graphic, and the words you want on it. This prompt brings them together in a product image you can use to explore the direction. Check the lettering and print placement, then try a different colorway.

Design a cream T-shirt with a coral sun and green “WEEKEND CLUB” lettering. Show it as a clean product photo on a peach background.
Try this prompt free

The images above illustrate the workflow. Run the prompt to compare your own results.

When to choose Sunburst

Sometimes the image is almost right, but “almost” means another round of work. The packaging needs to stay the same. The background needs to change. The headline needs room to breathe. OpenAI recommends Sunburst for workflows where editing precision matters most. It is a sensible model to test when a brief has several constraints and you want to see how well they hold together.

Read OpenAI’s model notes for Sunburst and Flare.

Product edits with clear boundaries

Product edits with clear boundaries

Start with your own product photo. Ask for a new setting while keeping the label, shape, and camera angle. Inspect those details side by side with the original before choosing a final image.

Posters with a deliberate layout

Posters with a deliberate layout

Specify the headline, the subject’s position, and the space you want to leave for supporting copy. Sunburst is worth testing when composition matters as much as the illustration.

A careful second pass

A careful second pass

Give an existing concept one focused revision: warmer lighting, a quieter background, or a different material. List the parts you want preserved so the model has a clear editing brief.

Sunburst vs Flare: where to start

Choose based on the job in front of you. Flare suits a quick first draft; Sunburst is worth trying when you need a more precise edit. Both can generate new images and work from an uploaded reference.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst and Flare compared
Your prioritySunburstFlare
Model focusCapability and editing precisionSpeed and everyday generation
A useful first testA product edit with several details to preserveA social image or a new campaign concept
Free Playground output1024 × 1024 PNG, medium quality1024 × 1024 PNG, medium quality
Try itTry Sunburst freeTry Flare free

Model positioning: OpenAI Sunburst documentation and OpenAI Flare documentation. The suggested tests are our practical starting points. Generation time and results vary with the brief.

Independent model rankings

GPT Image 2.5 on Arena

Sunburst and Flare hold the top two positions in these Arena snapshots. Here are the scores, along with the original leaderboards so you can check the evidence yourself.

Text-to-image generation

#1 · Sunburst
1,421 ± 13
#2 · Flare
1,399 ± 13
See Arena’s text-to-image generation leaderboard →

Single-image editing

#1 · Sunburst
1,520 ± 9
#2 · Flare
1,491 ± 9
See Arena’s single-image editing leaderboard →

Arena snapshot dated , checked . Both models are marked preliminary. The ± values are Arena’s reported uncertainty. Scores reflect human preferences, not accuracy percentages; rankings may change as votes accumulate. These scores evaluate the models, not Playground’s free trial settings.

Frequently Asked Questions

Last updated: